The State surrenders the Alamo; Run for cover

Things seemed to be going pretty well since the State of Texas exercised its authority over the Alamo and its grounds in 2011, wresting the fiefdom away from the Daughters of the Republic of Texas. The State was behaving so responsibly a recent Express-News editorial dared to broach recommending the City of San Antonio consider ceding its control of Alamo Plaza to the management of the state.

Those words should be retracted now.

Saturday, Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson is inviting an armed invasion of the grounds. Not only inviting it, but giving those bearing arms a warm welcome.


Sponsor regards taxation as “stealing,” so hold onto your wallet Commissioner Patterson. As you are paid by the state, your wallet is filled with stolen money.

Sponsor actively takes a passive-aggressive approach to fulfill its purposes. One of those it proudly proclaims is to:

foster a cooperative relationship with local law enforcement in the furtherance of these goals with an eye towards preventing negative encounters.

One of the ways followers accomplish this is to set up traps for the police. One recent example was at a Starbucks in San Antonio. Three perfectly innocent gun-toting men order their coffee and park themselves at a table outside. Some customers evacuate. Several frightened patrons, much to the “surprise” of the men who just happened to be filming themselves while sipping their coffee, called police. So begins the “harassment” that has fired up the gun rights advocates:

We will all meet in San Antonio to stand up in one of the most important challenges we have had to face. This event will be a strong message to Chief McManus that we have a right to bear arms and …it will NOT be infringed. We are drawing a line in the sand on the historic land of the Alamo.

Their heroes, according to posts on DontComply’s facebook page, appear to be those who are burning police barricades in Washington. Among those joining Commissioner Patterson will be Mike Vanderboegh, who nicely blogged in advance about the plans of the San Antonio Police Department, offering advice to film everything going on for opportunities for lawsuits against not only the SAPD but “against individual officers and the entire chain of command individually as well as the city who failed to properly train, supervise, etc….”

Way to go, boys. You really know how to make the police feel all warm and fuzzy about you and your cause.

Another object of sponsor Open Carry Texas is:

to condition Texans to feel safe around law-abiding citizens that choose to carry them (rifles and shotguns).

Hint, placing a powder keg in front of the Alamo is not a way to forward that goal.

Oh, I know what the organizers are going to say: “Don’t worry, the matches are in the other pocket.”

But the attendees will all have matches, and, from the tweets chirping on twitter, it sounds as though some of the attendees might not mind provoking police.

While it might be a Texan’s right to carry a rifle, won’t the demonstrators be breaking Texas law by amassing an army of armed civilians in the middle of a cosmopolitan area? What are they hunting, pigeons?

Organizers can plead they are not “calculating to alarm,” but I beg to differ. Ask the spouse of a San Antonio police officer heading to work on Saturday morning if he or she is alarmed. Ask me. I am totally frightened of those who would gather armed in a public park, at a state monument frequented by families with children. I wouldn’t set foot within two blocks of Alamo Plaza on Saturday with a bullet-proof vest.

As for the Land Commissioner opening the grounds of the Alamo to welcome the armed demonstration, I am appalled. He is essentially shutting down the Alamo and its grounds to anyone worried about people slinging guns around their children.

And what kind of precedent does it set for future gatherings? Seems as though most any group might as well apply to gather in front of the Alamo now.

I don’t think I’m ready to say bring back the Daughters, but Commissioner Patterson’s participation in baiting the San Antonio Police Department is dangerously irresponsible.

Update on October 17, 2013:

Commissioner Patterson does not seem to comprehend how alarming the scenario he is endorsing is to anyone who follows current events. He is living in a fantasy Leave-It-To-Beaver world leftover from his childhood when he could put on a coonskin cap and carry a gun to school for show-and-tell. What would he think if one of his children were watching a Disney movie at the local theatre and a man carrying a shotgun came in and sat down beside her or him?

Anyway, I’ll leave it to him to make his case. These are his own misguided thoughts as published in The Bay Area Citizen:

Patterson: Standing up for liberty at the Alamo is Texas tradition

By Jerry Patterson Texas Land Commissioner

AUSTIN — The last time hundreds of Texans showed up at the Alamo with rifles, they were hailed as heroes in their stand against a tyrannical government.

Texas — and Texans — have changed a lot since then. But the fundamental, Constitutional right to keep and bear arms has not.

The main goal of today’s rally at the Alamo is simple: The peaceful exercise of a right we fear losing. It is legal, after all, to carry a long gun in Texas. Despite that fact, there are those who would claim otherwise under color of law. Today’s demonstration is expression of that right, plain and simple.

It should be noted, San Antonio’s city council has declared they will not enforce the city’s unconstitutional ordinance prohibiting any person other than police or security officers from carrying a firearm within the city limits at a public event. They know they would lose any challenge to an arrest made under such city ordinance in a court of law. So in that respect, today’s Second Amendment exercise has already been successful.

But a more subtle goal of today’s gathering is one largely been lost in the media hype surrounding it, and that is the effect such a rally might have to help normalize the sight of an armed citizen.

The fact that many Texans only feel comfortable with police carrying guns isn’t normal, historically speaking. Armed citizens shouldn’t be alarming in a free society.

It wasn’t always so. I can remember bringing an old, Civil War-era muzzle-loader I had gotten for Christmas to Hartman Junior High School in Houston for show and tell. Instead of causing a lock-down and a S.W.A.T. response, it elicited the ohhs and ahhs of other kids who got an impromptu lesson in gun safety and history. Nothing, in my opinion, could be more normal than that.

By agreeing to speak to this rally at the Alamo today, I am doing what I think is best to ease the fear that has gripped our state and our nation when it comes to guns. Texans — and Americans in general — shouldn’t be defined by our fears but by our freedoms. We are stronger than that.

He’s looking for a campaign photo op, but here’s hoping this line in the sand proves to be Jerry Patterson’s quicksand.

5 thoughts on “The State surrenders the Alamo; Run for cover”

  1. It just gets weirder and weirder, doesn’t it?

    One hesitates when considering a proper counter-demonstration, as anyone of a different mind would likely not be carrying firearms.

    Armed demonstrators all fired up? What kind of a place is this?


  2. Thank you for this Gayle. Hi Roland nice to see you. You both said it perfectly. I am so distraught about Patterson’s approval of this insanity, and the LACK of outrage by my readers when I posted it that I have decided to stop my Alamo Battlefield Facebook page. I’ve had it.


  3. I changed my mind. Tom Nuckols’ response to your column I posted on my 1936 mailing list was:” Of an event in Alamo Plaza, Jerry Patterson very recently said “This would not happen at Gettysburg. No one would even imagine holding such an event at the USS Arizona in Pearl Harbor…It should be treated as the hallowed ground that it is.” Well, they don’t allow political rallies at Gettysburg or the USS Arizona. so Jerry Patterson is a rank hypocrite. He’s offended by events at the Alamo that don’t benefit him, but he’s all for events that do benefit him. He’s crassly using not only the Plaza, but the Alamo grounds, as a pawn in his race for lieutenant governor. If any of you are not disgusted by this fiasco, you don’t care enough about the Alamo. You care more for things non-Alamo, and are willing to sell out the Alamo for those things. That’s utter crap.”
    I’m going to petition for his impeachment.


  4. As if the police don’t have enough trouble, this group — armed with assault weapons — is provoking the police. I’ll make sure I’m nowhere downtown on Saturday.


  5. Let’s ask Patterson why he, a gun rights and private property rights advocate, is being sued in federal court by private property owner the Gulf Coast Rod, Reel and Gun Club.

    He doesn’t think the little storm-ravaged town of Gilchrist should exist anymore. He wants to spend state GLO money reimbursing Galveston County commissioners and judge to take Rollover Pass by any means necessary. Never mind that it’s a nationally known family and fishing destination that drives the Bolivar peninsula economy more than anything else.

    Jerry Patterson, who loves history so much, probably doesn’t care that the Texas Sate Historical Site on private property, Rollover Pass, hasn’t had its historical marker replaced. Your FEMA tax dollars have already paid for it. It’s only been five years.

    The citizens of Gilchrist don’t like being bullied. Why would anyone want to take what little is left from a community that has lost everything? Remember the photo of “the Last House Standing?”

    Patterson’s political career is an endangered species.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.